Growth of Oryzias melastigma with different fishing strategies
CSTR:
Author:
Clc Number:

S931

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [32]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Different fishing strategies have different effects on adaptive changes in the morphological characteristics of fish species. To evaluate the impact of different fishing strategies on the growth characteristics of fish, the marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) was used as the model organism. Seven fishing strategies were used: 90% large individual fishing (high-intensity large individual fishing, H-B), 90% random fishing (high-intensity random fishing, M-R), 75% large individual fishing (middle-intensity large individual fishing, H-B), 75% random fishing (middle-intensity random fishing, M-R), 50% large individual fishing (low-intensity large individual fishing, L-B), 50% random fishing (low-intensity random fishing, L-R), and 75% small individual fishing (middle-intensity small individual fishing, M-S). The growth characteristics of O. melastigma in the F1–F3 generations were determined. The egg diameter and larval length of O. melastigma were significantly different under the different fishing strategies in the same generation (P<0.01). Among different generations, the egg diameter increased in the high- intensity fishing treatment group (90% fishing strategy condition) and decreased in the low intensity fishing treatment group (50% fishing strategy condition). However, different generations had little effect on the hatchability and survival rate of the next generation of eggs. The growth rate of the low-intensity fishing treatment group was higher than that of the other treatment groups in the juvenile stage among different generations. During the intergenerational larval development stage, the growth rate of the high-intensity fishing treatment group increased rapidly. This growth rate was significantly higher in the early stage than in the late stage. However, the growth rate of the high-intensity fishing treatment group was lower in the larval and juvenile stages. With the increase in external fishing pressure, the instantaneous growth rate of the high-intensity fishing treatment group was the lowest among the same generation. The instantaneous growth rates of the low-intensity and large individual fishing strategy groups were stable among generations. Similar to the current fishing strategy, high intensity and large individual fishing will lead to great differences in the biological characteristics of fish in three generations. Therefore, for the sustainable utilization of fishery resources and to predict the development trend of fish evolution, it is imperative to study the changes in biological traits of fish caused by fish-induced evolution by simulating the different fishing strategies.

    Reference
    [1] Walsh M R,Munch S B,Chiba S,et al.Maladaptive changes in multiple traits caused by fishing:impediments to population recovery[J].Ecology Letters,2010,9(2):142-148.
    [2] Johansen O G.Size-dependent predation on juvenile herring(Clupea harengus L.)by Northeast Arctic cod(Gadus morhua L.)in the Barents Sea[J].Sarsia,2010,88(2):136-152.
    [3] Zimmermann F,J?rgensen C.Bioeconomic consequences of fishing-induced evolution:a model predicts limited impact on net present value[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences,2015,72(4):612-624.
    [4] J?rgensen C,Enberg K,Dunlop E S,et al.Managing evolving fish stocks[J].Science,2007,318(5854):1247-1248.
    [5] Wijk S J,Taylor M I,Creer S,et al.Experimental harvesting of fish populations drives genetically based shifts in body size and maturation[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2013,11(4):181-187.
    [6] Uusi-Heikkila S,Whiteley A R,Kuparinen A,et al.The evolutionary legacy of size-selective harvesting extends from genes to populations[J].Evolutionary Applications,2015,8(6):597-620.
    [7] Dunlop E S,Heino M,Dieckmann U.Eco-genetic modeling of contemporary life-history evolution[J].Ecological Applications,2009,19(7):1815-1834.
    [8] Heino M,Pauli B D,Dieckmann U.Fisheries-Induced Evolution[J].Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2015,46:461-480.
    [9] Conover D O,Munch S B.Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales[J].Science,2002,297(5578):94-96.
    [10] Li J S,Hu F,Yan L P,et al.The fecundity of chub mackerel(Scomber japonicus)spawning stocks in the central east China Sea[J].Progress in Fishery Sciences,2014,35(6):10-15.[李建生,胡芬,严利平,等.东海中部日本鲭(Scomber japonicus)产卵群体繁殖力特征[J].渔业科学进展,2014,35(6):10-15.]
    [11] Li Z L.Interannual changes in biological characteristics of small yellow croaker Larimichthys polyactis,Pacific Cod Gadus macrocephalus and Anglerfish Lophius litulon in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea[D].Qingdao:Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2011:40-55.[李忠炉.黄渤海小黄鱼、大头鳕和黄鮟鱇种群生物学特征的年际变化 [D].青岛:中国科学院研究生院,2011:40-55.]
    [12] J?rgensen T.Long-term changes in age at sexual maturity of Northeast Arctic cod(Gadus morhua L)[J].Ices Journal of Marine Science,1990,46(3):235-248.
    [13] Klara B,Jakobsd?3ttir,Pardoe H,et al.Historical changes in genotypic frequencies at the Pantophysin locus in Atlantic cod(Gadus morhua)in Icelandic waters:evidence of fisheriesinduced selection?[J].Evolutionary Applications,2011,4(4):562-573.
    [14] Therkildsen N O,Hemmer-Hansen J,Als T D,et al.Microevolution in time and space:SNP analysis of historical DNA reveals dynamic signatures of selection in Atlantic cod[J].Molecular Ecology,2013,22(9):2424-2440.
    [15] Zeng X J.Controllability and optimal catch strategy of fishery resource systems[J].Control Theory and Applications,1991,8(4):356-371.[曾晓军.渔业资源系统的可控性与最优捕捞策略[J].控制理论与应用,1991,8(4):356-371.]
    [16] Liang R J,Lin Z S,Ren X H.Fishing strategy and study of dynamic prediction of sustainable utilize in marine fishery resources[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2006,29(3):108-112.[梁仁君,林振山,任晓辉.海洋渔业资源可持续利用的捕捞策略和动力预测[J].南京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,29(3):108-112.]
    [17] Lewin W,Arlinghaus R,Mehner T.Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing:Insights for management and conservation[J].Reviews in Fisheries Science,2006,14(4):305-367.
    [18] Brooks S,Tyler C R,Sumpter J P.Egg quality in fish:what makes a good egg?[J].Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries,1997,7(4):387-416.
    [19] Bonner R,Peters R H.The ecological implications of bodysize[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1985,22(1):291-292.
    [20] Houde E D.Early life dynamics and recruitment variability [J].American Fisheries Society Symposium,1987,2:17-29.
    [21] Rijnsdorp A D,Vingerhoed B.The ecological significance of geographical and seasonal differences in egg size in Sole Solea-solea(L)[J].Netherlands Journal of Sea Research,1994,32(3-4):255-270.
    [22] Pepin P,Myers R A.Significance of egg and larval size to recruitment variability of a temperate marine fish[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences,1991,48(10):1820-1828.
    [23] Houde E D.Patterns and trends in larval-stage growth and mortality of teleost fish[J].Journal of Fish Biology,2006,51(sA):52-83
    [24] Palmer A R.Do carbonate skeletons limit the rate of body growth?[J].Nature,1981,292(5819):150-152.
    [25] Arendt J D.Adaptive intrinsic growth rates:an integration across taxa[J].Quarterly Review of Biology,1997,72(2):149–177.
    [26] Saunders R L,Farrell A P,Knox D E.Progression of coronary arterial lesions in Atlantic Salmon(Salmo salar)as a function of growth rate[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences,1992,49(5):878-884.
    [27] Franois C,Pat M,Lubna N,et al.Early nutrition and phenotypic development:'catch-up' growth leads to elevated metabolic rate in adulthood[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,2018,275(1642):1565-1570.
    [28] Li Z L,Jin X S,Shan X J,et al.Inter-annual changes on body weight-length relationship and relative fatness of small yellow croaker(Larimichthys polyactis)[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2011,18(3):602-610.[李忠炉,金显仕,单秀娟,等.小黄鱼体长-体重关系和肥满度的年际变化[J].中国水产科学,2011,18(3):602-610.]
    [29] Mou X X,Zhang C,Zhang C L,et al.The fisheries biology of the spawning stock of Scomberomorus niphonius in the Bohai and Yellow Seas[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2018,25(6):1308-1316.[牟秀霞,张弛,张崇良,等.黄渤海蓝点马鲛繁殖群体渔业生物学特征研究[J].中国水产科学,2018,25(6):1308-1316.]
    [30] Ling J Z,Li S F,Yan L P,et al.Utilization and management of Trichiurus japonicus resources in East China Sea based on Beverton-Holt model[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(1):178-182.[凌建忠,李圣法,严利平,等.基于 Beverton-Holt 模型的东海带鱼资源利用与管理[J].应用生态学报[J].2008,19(1):178-182.]
    [31] Lu J W,Luo B Z,Lan Y L,et al.Studies on characteristics and successions of structure of fishery resources in the China seas[J].Studia Marina Sinica,1995,10:195-211.[卢继武,罗秉征,兰永伦,等.中国近海渔业资源结构特点及演替的研究[J].海洋科学集刊,1995,10:195-211.]
    [32] Han Y.Governance and policy adjustment of marine fishery resources in China since 1949[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2018,9:14-28.[韩杨.1949 年以来中国海洋渔业资源治理与政策调整[J].中国农村经济,2018,9:14-28.]
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

苏程程,单秀娟,邵长伟. 不同捕捞策略对海水青鳉不同发育阶段生长的影响[J]. Jounal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2021,[volume_no](12):1576-1587

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Online: December 27,2021
Article QR Code