六边形开口方形人工鱼礁阻力系数数值模拟与模型试验比较研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S95

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31972845);农业农村部转产转业项目-江苏省海州湾国家级海洋牧场示范项目(D-8005-18-0188,D8006-16-8060).


Comparison of a numerical simulation and a test model of a hexagonal and square opening artificial reef
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了对4种不同开口大小的六边形开口方形人工鱼礁在4种迎流角度下数值模拟和水槽模型试验的阻力系数进行对比验证,分别利用水槽模型和数值模拟试验方法对4种不同开口比(γty=0.0625,0.14,0.25,0.39)六边形开口方形人工鱼礁在4种迎流角度(θ=0°,15°,30°,45°)状态下的阻力进行测定,并计算两种方法的阻力系数。结果表明:(1)在数值模拟和水槽模型试验中,人工鱼礁模型阻力均随着开口比的增大而减小;礁体迎流角度的变化可改变礁体阻力,且在4种迎流角度下,人工鱼礁阻力在θ=30°时最大。(2)人工鱼礁数值模拟与水槽模型试验中,当θ为15°、30°和45°时,阻力系数均随着开口比的增加而增加,具有明显的线性关系,且阻力系数在迎流角度θ=30°时最大。(3)数值模拟与模型试验阻力的相对误差在0.12%~17.18%,平均误差7.43%;礁体阻力系数的相对误差在0.03%~14.64%,平均误差5.26%。阻力及阻力系数误差均在20%以下。水槽模型试验与数值模拟阻力和阻力系数相关系数R分别为0.99和0.80,P<0.001,具有极强的相关性。因此,利用数值模拟精细化研究人工鱼礁水动力性能是可行的。

    Abstract:

    To verify the resistance coefficient used in numerical simulations and experimental models of hexagonal and square opening artificial reefs, an experimental model and numerical simulations were used to measure and calculate the resistance coefficients of the two methods at four different opening rates (γty=0.0625, 0.14, 0.25 and 0.39) in hexagonal opening and square opening artificial reefs with four kinds of flow angles of attack (θ=0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°). The results showed that (1) in both the numerical simulation and the experimental model, the resistance of artificial reef models decreased with the increase in opening rate. The resistance of reef models can be changed by changing the angles of attack. In addition, the artificial reef model resistance reached a maximum at θ=30° at four angles of attack. (2) In both the numerical simulation and the model experiment, when θ=15°, 30°, and 45°, the resistance coefficient increased with an increase of opening rate in an obvious linear relationship, and the resistance coefficient reached its maximum when θ=30°. (3) The relative error of resistance between the numerical simulation and the experimental model resistance ranged from 0.12% to 17.18%, with an average error of 7.43%; the relative error of resistance coefficient ranged from 0.03% to 14.64%, with an average error of 5.26%. The resistance and coefficient of resistance error were below 20%. The correlation coefficients, R, between the experimental model and the numerical simulation for resistance and resistance coefficients were 0.99 and 0.80, respectively (P<0.001), showing a strong correlation. Therefore, it is feasible to use numerical simulation to study the hydrodynamic performance of artificial reefs.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张硕,张世东,胡夫祥,初文华,黄成裕,刘斐凡,张秋驰.六边形开口方形人工鱼礁阻力系数数值模拟与模型试验比较研究[J].中国水产科学,2020,27(11):1350-1359
ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Shidong, HU Fuxiang, CHU Wenhua, HUANG Chengyu, LIU Feifan, ZHANG Qiuchi. Comparison of a numerical simulation and a test model of a hexagonal and square opening artificial reef[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2020,27(11):1350-1359

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-24
  • 最后修改日期:2020-02-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码