高效脱氮菌强化挂膜生物滤器对海水养殖尾水净化效果研究
作者:
作者简介:

李秋芬(1969–),研究员,研究方向为海洋渔业环境微生物与生态修复.E-mail:liqf@ysfri.ac.cn

中图分类号:

S969

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目蓝色粮仓创新专项(2019YFD0901202); 中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费项目(2020TD12).


Purification effect of a simulated biofilter augmented with efficient nitrogen-removing bacteria on waste water from mariculture
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了提高海水养殖尾水的净化效率, 研究了利用高效脱氮菌强化挂膜后的生物滤器对静止和流动养殖尾水的净化效果。首先利用自主筛选的 3 株适应海水环境、可有效去除氨氮、亚硝酸氮及有机物的高效脱氮菌[花津滩芽孢杆菌(Bacillus hwajinpoensis)SLWX2、嗜碱盐单胞菌(Halomonas alkaliphila)X3 和麦氏交替单胞菌(Alteromonas macleodii)SLNX2]的不同组合强化挂膜, 根据成熟后的生物滤器对定量静止养殖尾水中 NH4+ -N、NO2 -N、NO3 -N、 总氮(TN)及化学需氧量(CODMn)的去除效果, 选出对各无机氮去除效果最佳的菌种组合作为强化菌种再次挂膜, 分析不同浓度强化菌种挂膜对流动养殖尾水中 NH4+ -N、NO2 -N 和 NO3 -N 的持续净化效果,以上实验均以自然挂膜组为对照。静止尾水处理实验结果表明, 各实验组中 NO3 -N 浓度先上升后下降, 对养殖尾水各项无机氮及有机物指标的去除效果均优于对照组。其中, SLWX2+X3+SLNX2 组合高浓度组对养殖尾水中的各项指标去除效果最佳, 在第 48 小时对 NH4+ -N、NO2 -N、CODMn 和 TN 的去除率分别达到 100%、100%、80.7%和 59.5%。而自然挂膜对照组的去除率分别为 95.5%、50.52%、38.1%、13.44%, 且 NO3– -N 浓度持续上升。说明脱氮菌强化挂膜可明显提高生物滤器对养殖尾水的净化效率, 有效降低养殖尾水中氮素和有机物的浓度。后期连续流动尾水净化实验结果表明, 实验组和对照组生物滤器出水的 NH4+ -N、NO2 -N、NO3 -N 浓度均低于进水的, 强化挂膜组的又均低于自然挂膜组的, 其中 106 CFU/mL 实验组对无机氮的去除效果均最佳, NH4+ -N NO2 -N NO3 -N 的最大去除率分别为 31.6%、11.33%、 15.6%; 105 CFU/mL 实验组次之, 且出水氮素浓度可长期维持在较低水平。说明脱氮菌强化挂膜对各项无机氮的去除效果持续优于自然挂膜。本实验的结果为脱氮菌在海水养殖尾水净化中的应用提供了理论基础和技术支撑。

    Abstract:

    Purification of discharged aquaculture waste water and nitrogen removal have become essential practices as environment protection policies impose increasingly strict waste water discharge restrictions. To improve the purification efficiency of maricultural waste water, we studied the purification effect of biofilters augmented by different compositions of 3 nitrogen-removing bacteria strains on static and flowing maricultural waste water. Firstly, different compositions of 3 nitrogen-removing bacteria strains, Bacillus hwajinpoensis SLWX2, Halomonas alkaliphila X3, and Alteromonas macleodii SLNX2, which can remove ammonia, nitrite and organic matters in the marine environment were used to strengthen biofilm formation and to purify static waste water, and the best combination was selected according to its removal efficiency of inorganic nitrogen, TN, and CODMn, for the treatment of flowing waste water. The continuous removal of NH4+ -N, NO2 -N, and NO3 -N from flowing discharged aquaculture waste water was compared with that of naturally formed biofilters. Static waste water treatment results showed that the concentration of NO3 -N increased then decreased and that the removal efficiency of inorganic nitrogen and organic matter from the waste water in trial groups was better than that in the control group. Among the treatments, the group of highly concentrated SLWX2+X3+SLNX2 had the best purification effect on all indexes for waste water, and the removal rates of NH4+ -N NO2 -N, CODMn, and TN were 100%, 100%, 80.7%, and 59.5%, respectively, after 48 h. In the control group, they were 95.5%, 50.52%, 38.1%, and 13.44%, respectively, and the concentrations of NO3 -N kept increasing. The results showed that enhanced biofilm formation by nitrogen-removal bacteria can significantly improve the purification efficiency of biofilters and effectively reduce the concentration of nitrogen and organic matter in waste water from mariculture. The results of the experiment on purification of continuously flowing waste water showed that the concentration of NH4+ -N, NO2 -N and NO3 -N in the effluent of the experimental groups and the control group was lower than that in the influent. Furthermore, these measurements from the bacteria-augmented biofilm group were lower than those from the natural biofilm and the removal efficiency of inorganic nitrogen in the 106 CFU/mL experimental group was the highest, with the maximum removal rates of 31.6%, 11.33%, and 15.6%, respectively. This was followed by the 105 CFU/mL test group, and the concentration of inorganic nitrogen in the effluent could be maintained at low levels for over 21 days, suggesting that the continuous removal effect of the enhanced biofilm was better than that of the natural biofilm. The results of this study provided a theoretical and technical basis for the application of nitrogen-removing bacteria in the purification of waste water from mariculture.

    参考文献
    [1] Zhang Q Z,Achal V,Xu Y T,et al.Aquaculture wastewater quality improvement by water spinach(Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal)floating bed and ecological benefit assessment in ecological agriculture district[J].Aquacultural Engineering,2014,60:48-55.
    [2] Liu Y,Liu B L.Opportunities and challenges for marine industrialized aquaculture in China[J].Fishery Modernization,2012,39(6):1-4,9.[刘鹰,刘宝良.我国海水工业化养殖面临的机遇和挑战[J].渔业现代化,2012,39(6):1-4,9.]
    [3] Dalsgaard J,Lund I,Thorarinsdottir R,et al.Farming different species in RAS in Nordic countries:Current status and future perspectives[J].Aquacultural Engineering,2013,53:2-13.
    [4] Zhang T,Luo H Z,Zhou C S,et al.Effect of different hydraulic retention time on biofilm formation and water treatment of biofiltor[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences,2015,56(12):2051-2054.[张涛,罗海忠,周朝生,等.不同水力停留时间对生物滤池滤料挂膜及水处理效果的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2015,56(12):2051-2054.]
    [5] Cheng H H,Zhu J X,Qu K M,et al.Effect of different organic carbon sources and C/N on the bio-filter purification[J].Progress in Fishery Sciences,2016,37(1):127-134.[程海华,朱建新,曲克明,等.不同有机碳源及 C/N 对生物滤池净化效果的影响[J].渔业科学进展,2016,37(1):127-134.]
    [6] Huang B,Lei J L,Zhai J M,et al.Effect of the air-to-liquid ratio on treatment efficiency of wastewater in multistage BAF in a recirculating aquaculture system[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2013,20(6):1266-1273.[黄滨,雷霁霖,翟介明,等.封闭循环水系统生物滤池气水比对水质净化效能的影响[J].中国水产科学,2013,20(6):1266-1273.]
    [7] Cao W P.Comparison of two materials as biofilm carriersfor bioremediation of micro-contamination river water[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2014,8(3):967-971.[曹文平.2 种填料作为生物膜载体修复微污染河水的比较[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(3):967-971.]
    [8] Wang W,Qu K M,Zhu J X,et al.Biofilm cultivation with three stuffings and their effect on the growth of young black sea bream,Sparus macrocephalus[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2012,19(5):833-840.[王威,曲克明,朱建新,等.3 种滤料生物滤器的挂膜与黑鲷幼鱼循环水养殖效果[J].中国水产科学,2012,19(5):833-840.]
    [9] Quan X C,Cen Y,Qian Y.Isolation,identification of two aerobic denitrifiers and bioaugmentation for enhancing denitrificaition of biofilm under oligotrophic conditions[J].Environmental Science,2013,34(7):2862-2868.[全向春,岑艳,钱殷.2 株好氧反硝化菌的筛选及其强化贫营养生物膜脱氮效果[J].环境科学,2013,34(7):2862-2868.]
    [10] Zhang T,Zhou C S,Luo H Z,et al.Preliminary study on the effect of denitrifying bacteria on media biofilm formation of biofilter and water treatment[J].Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences,2015,56(8):1287-1290.[张涛,周朝生,罗海忠,等.反硝化细菌对生物滤池滤料挂膜及水处理效果的初步研究[J].浙江农业科学,2015,56(8):1287-1290.]
    [11] Feng Z H,Xu J T,Li Y,et al.Study on the biofilm formation process of biofilter in a closed seawater recirculating aquaculture system[J].Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2010,19(4):79-82.[冯志华,徐军田,李玉,等.封闭循环海水养殖生物滤池生物膜形成过程研究[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2010,19(4):79-82.]
    [12] Li Q F,Fu X J,Zhang Y,et al.PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial communities in bio-filtors of re-circulating mariculture system[J].Journal of Fisheries of China,2011,35(4):579-586.[李秋芬,傅雪军,张艳,等.循环水养殖系统生物滤池细菌群落的 PCR-DGGE 分析[J].水产学报,2011,35(4):579-586.]
    [13] Robertson L A,Vanniele W J,Torremansr A M,et al.Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in aetobichemostat cultures of Thiosphaera pantotropha[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1988,54(11):2812-2818.
    [14] Sun X M,Li Q F,Zhang Y,et al.Phylogenetic analysis and nitrogen removal characteristics of a heterotrophic nitrifying-aerobic denitrifying bacteria strain from marine environment[J].Acta Microbiologica Sinica,2012,52(6):687-695.[孙雪梅,李秋芬,张艳,等.一株海水异养硝化-好氧反硝化菌系统发育及脱氮特性[J].微生物学报,2012,52(6):687-695.]
    [15] Cheng Y,Li Q F,Fei Y T,et al.Screening and nitrogen removing characteristics of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacteria SLWX2 from sea water[J].Environmental Science,2016,37(7):2681-2688.[成钰,李秋芬,费聿涛,等.海水异养硝化-好氧反硝化芽孢杆菌SLWX2的筛选及脱氮特性[J].环境科学,2016,37(7):2681-2688.]
    [16] Li Q F,Sun X M,Zhang Y,et al.Environmental adaptability of heterotrophic nitrifying-aerobic denitrifying bacteria strain X3[J].Progress in Fishery Sciences,2013,34(3):120-125.[李秋芬,孙雪梅,张艳,等.异养硝化-好氧反硝化菌株X3的环境适应性[J].渔业科学进展,2013,34(3):120-125.]
    [17] Wang Y,Cheng Y,Li Q F,et al.Effects of different nitrogen sources and environmental factors on the nitrogen removal performance of Bacillus hwajinpoensis SLWX2[J].Progress in Fishery Sciences,2019,40(1):133-140.[王越,成钰,李秋芬,等.不同氮源和环境因子对花津滩芽孢杆菌SLWX2脱氮性能的影响[J].渔业科学进展,2019,40(1):133-140.]
    [18] Kang C L,Li Q F,Zhang Y,et al.Purifying effect of three heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacteria strains on the farming water of Verasper variegates[J].Progress in Fishery Sciences,2018,39(2):42-48.[康传磊,李秋芬,张艳,等.三株异养硝化–好氧反硝化细菌对圆斑星鲽养殖水质的净化效果[J].渔业科学进展,2018,39(2):42-48.]
    [19] Song X F,Pan Y L,Ma Z,et al.Effects of single bacteria and mixed strains in aquaculture wastewater treatment system[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2015,9(7):3281-3287.[宋协法,潘玉兰,马真,等.单菌种和混合菌处理养殖污水的效果[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(7):3281-3287.]
    [20] Zhu X,Zheng X Y,Zhu N W,et al.Effect of reversed AAO/MBR combined processes on improvement of denitrification by prolonging HRT in anoxic zone[J].Water Purification Technology,2017,36(1):67-72.[朱星,郑晓英,朱宁伟,等.延长缺氧区水力停留时间提高倒置 AAO/MBR 组合工艺的脱氮效果[J].净水技术,2017,36(1):67-72.]
    [21] Wu Q,Zhang R F,Luo W,et al.Design of COD automatic detection device based on the principle of ORP[J].Electronic Science and Technology,2017,30(1):168-172.[邬奇,张荣福,罗玮,等.基于ORP原理的COD自动检测装置的设计[J].电子科技,2017,30(1):168-172.]
    [22] Tu W L,Hu Z B,Liang Y C,et al.Experimental study on remediation of sediments in urban black-odorous rivers by denitrifying bacteria[J].Environmental Engineering,2015,33(10):5-9,25.[涂玮灵,胡湛波,梁益聪,等.反硝化细菌修复城市黑臭河道底泥实验研究[J].环境工程,2015,33(10):5-9,25.]
    [23] Liu Q S,Li H,Dong H B,et al.Variation of dissolved oxygen in fish recirculating aquaculture system and its removal performance of pollutants[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2017,11(1):244-250.[刘青松,李华,董宏标,等.鱼类循环水养殖系统DO变动及污染物去除[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(1):244-250.]
    [24] Du Q P,Lu R B,Zheng Z C,et al.Treatment of pine oil wastewater with joint biofilm of four predominant strains[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2016,10(7):3396-3400.[杜青平,卢仁钵,郑志成,等.4 株优势菌联合挂膜对松醇油废水的治理[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(7):3396-3400.]
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李秋芬,康传磊,张艳,陈碧鹃,陈世波.高效脱氮菌强化挂膜生物滤器对海水养殖尾水净化效果研究[J].中国水产科学,2021,28(5):614-623
Li Qiufen, Kang Chuanlei, Zhang Yan, Chen Bijuan, Chen Shibo. Purification effect of a simulated biofilter augmented with efficient nitrogen-removing bacteria on waste water from mariculture[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2021,28(5):614-623

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:763
  • 下载次数: 1369
  • HTML阅读次数: 1024
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-05-20
文章二维码