中国对虾4代人工选育群体与1个野生群体遗传多样性分析及差异SNP位点筛查
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

盖超伟(1995?),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为对虾遗传育种.E-mail:gaichaowei999@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S961

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U1706203); 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0901302); 中国水产科学研究院创新团队项目(2020TD26).


Genetic diversity analysis and SNP loci screening of four generations of Fenneropenaeus chinensis and one wild population
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用 2b-RAD 技术对中国对虾(Fenneropenaeus chinensis) 2015 年、2016 年、2017 年、2019 年 4 代选育群体和野生群体合计 821 尾个体进行简化基因组测序, 分析中国对虾人工选育群体和野生群体遗传多样性特征, 挖掘在持续人工选育过程中受选择的 SNP 位点。测序共得到 83767 个 SNP 位点, F-统计结果显示, 野生群体与选育群体间遗传分化系数(FST)均值为 0.022, 野生群体与 2019 年选育群体之间遗传分化程度最高为 0.0260, 与 2015 年选育群体之间遗传分化程度最低为 0.0190; 野生群体与选育群体之间遗传分化系数(FST)均小于 0.05, 为弱遗传分化。 群体主成分分析(PCA)结果显示野生群体与选育群体之间遗传结构未发生明显改变。遗传多样性统计结果表明,野生群体与选育群体期望杂合度(He)均值分别为 0.1716 和 0.1806, 观测杂合度(Ho)均值分别为 0.1861 和 0.1943, 多态性信息含量(PIC)均值分别为 0.1428 和 0.1515, 核苷酸多态性(Pi)均值分别为 0.1732 和 0.1813, 其中 2017 年、2019 年选育群体各遗传多样性指数与野生群体相比均存在显著差异(P<0.05)。对不同世代选育群体与野生群体进行选择消除分析, 分别得到 92 个、103 个、166 个、117 个受选择 SNP 位点, 共有位点数目为 4 个。相邻世代选育群体之间等位基因频率逐代上升的共有位点数目为 7107 个, 其中 3674 个位点显著偏离哈迪–温伯格平衡(P<0.05); 等位基因频率逐代下降的共有位点数目为 8501 个, 其中 4101 个位点显著偏离哈迪–温伯格平衡(P<0.05)。研究结果表明, 中国对虾经过累代人工选育, 依然具有较高的遗传选育潜力, 可以继续作为人工选育材料。

    Abstract:

    In this study, a total of 821 shrimps from four breeding population generations and a wild population of Fenneropenaeus chinensis (2015, 2016, 2017, and 2019) were sequenced using 2b-RAD technology to analyze the genetic diversity characteristics of artificial breeding and wild populations of F. chinensis, mining the selected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites in the continuous artificial selection process. A total of 83767 SNP sites were obtained by sequencing; F-statistics showed that the average coefficient of genetic differentiation (FST) between wild population and breeding populations was 0.022. The highest degree of genetic differentiation between the wild and breeding populations in 2019 was 0.0260; the lowest degree in 2015 was 0.0190. The FST between wild and breeding populations is less than 0.05, indicating weak genetic differentiation. The population principal component analysis results showed that the genetic structure between wild and breeding populations did not change significantly. The statistical results of genetic diversity showed that the average expected heterozygosity (He) of the wild population and the breeding populations were 0.1716 and 0.1806, respectively; the average observed heterozygosity (Ho) values were 0.1861 and 0.1943; and the average polymorphism information contents were 0.1428 and 0.1515. The mean values of nucleotide polymorphism (Pi) were 0.1732 and 0.1813. Among them, each genetic diversity index of the selected populations in 2017 and 2019 was significantly different compared to the wild population (P<0.05). Selection and elimination analysis of different generations of breeding and wild populations yielded 92, 103, 166, and 117 selected SNP loci; the number of common loci was 4. The number of common sites with allele frequencies increasing generation by generation between adjacent generations of selective breeding populations was 7107, of which 3674 sites deviated significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg balance (P<0.05). The allele frequency between adjacent generations of breeding populations decreased to 8501, of which 4101 loci significantly deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P<0.05). Results indicate that the population genetic diversity and genetic structure of F. chinensis have not changed significantly after artificial selection and breeding, and a high genetic selection potential is maintained.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

盖超伟,李旭鹏,曹宝祥,陈宝龙,张雅文,刘绵宇,栾生,孔杰,孟宪红.中国对虾4代人工选育群体与1个野生群体遗传多样性分析及差异SNP位点筛查[J].中国水产科学,2021,28(12):1505-1514
GAI Chaowei, LI Xupeng, CAO Baoxiang, CHEN Baolong, ZHANG Yawen, LIU Mianyu, LUAN Sheng, KONG Jie, MENG Xianhong. Genetic diversity analysis and SNP loci screening of four generations of Fenneropenaeus chinensis and one wild population[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2021,28(12):1505-1514

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-12-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码