桑沟湾底播养殖青蛤与魁蚶的食物来源
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李兵(1999-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为水产养殖生态学.E-mail:1374416047@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S968

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42376160); 国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFA0607603); 国家自然科学基金委员会-山东省人民政府联合基金项目(U1906216); 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2022QD035); 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所基本科研业务费专项(20603022022012); 渔业科学数据基础性长期监测项目(20603022022024).


Study on the food sources of bottom-sowing cultured Cyclina sinesis and Anadara broughtonii in Sanggou Bay
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解底播养殖经济贝类青蛤(Cyclina sinensis)和魁蚶(Anadara broughtonii)的食物来源, 本研究通过稳定同位素技术和高通量测序技术测定了桑沟湾贝类区与贝藻区中底播养殖青蛤和魁蚶的食物组成, 分析了食物来源差异性的影响因素。结果显示: (1) 青蛤和魁蚶的食物来源主要是浮游植物(占比 40.4%~79.6%), 其次是浮游动物 (13.3%~37.3%)。贝类生物沉积物和海带碎屑对青蛤与魁蚶的食物贡献率存在区域性差异。贝类养殖区生物沉积物和海带碎屑对青蛤的食物贡献率为 2.7% (贝类生物沉积物 2.0%, 海带碎屑 0.7%), 对魁蚶的食物贡献率为 10.3% (贝类生物沉积物 7.4%, 海带碎屑 2.9%); 贝藻养殖区青蛤为 8.5% (贝类生物沉积物 5.1%, 海带碎屑 3.4%), 魁蚶为 7.4% (贝类生物沉积物 4.3%, 海带碎屑 2.1%)。(2) 青蛤胃含物中的主要成分是绿藻门(占比达 56.55%), 其次是链形植物门(44.35%), 魁蚶胃含物中的主要成分是绿藻门(47.27%), 其次是脊索动物门(30.3%)。两种贝类胃含物中的真核生物组成主要是浮游植物, 且主要来自于底层海水中, 与稳定同位素结果一致。(3) 在贝类区和贝藻区, 筏式养殖产生的有机物(生物沉积物和海带碎屑)对魁蚶的贡献率高于青蛤; 贝藻区海带碎屑对青蛤的贡献率高于魁蚶。从食源结构的角度比较分析, 魁蚶和青蛤均可作为桑沟湾综合养殖区域的底播贝类, 青蛤更适宜底播在有藻类养殖的区域。

    Abstract:

    Cyclina sinensis and Anadara broughtonii are economically important bottom-sowing farming shellfish in China. Understanding their food sources can help quantify the interaction between shellfish and shallow sea aquaculture ecosystems and provide data support for the construction and screening of suitable bottom-sowing shellfish varieties for shallow sea comprehensive aquaculture models. In the present study, stable isotope and high-throughput sequencing technologies were used to determine the food composition characteristics of C. sinensis and A. broughtonii cultured in bottom sowings, and the differences and influencing factors of the food sources of the two shellfish were analyzed. Samples were collected from the bivalve culture area (BA) and bivalve kelp polyculture area (BKA) in Sanggou Bay in September 2021. The results showed the following: (1) The food sources of C. sinensis and A. broughtonii include phytoplankton, zooplankton, kelp detritus, shellfish biodeposition, seagrass detritus, C4 plants, and terrestrial sediments. Among them, phytoplankton were the main food source of C. sinensis and A. broughtonii (accounting for 40.4%–79.6%). Zooplankton are the second food source and the contribution rate of zooplankton to A. broughtonii (35.6%–37.3%) was significantly higher than that of C. sinensis (13.3%–15.9%). There were regional differences in the contribution rates of shellfish biodeposition and kelp detritus to the food of C. sinensis and A. broughtonii. The contribution rates of shellfish biodeposition to C. sinensis and A. broughtonii in the BA were 2.0% and 7.4%, respectively. The contributions of shellfish biodeposition to C. sinensis and A. broughtonii in the BKA were 5.1% and 4.3%, respectively. The contribution rates of kelp detritus to C. sinensis and A. broughtonii in BA were 0.7% and 2.9%, respectively, and those to C. sinensis and A. broughtonii in BKA were 3.4% and 2.1%, respectively. (2) The main component in the stomach contents of C. sinensis was chlorophyta (the proportion reached 56.55%), followed by streptophyta (44.35%); the main component in the stomach contents of A. broughtonii was chlorophyta (47.27%), followed by chordata (30.3%). This was closely related to the feeding mechanisms of the two shellfish species and their physiological structures. The feeding mechanism of filter-feeding shellfish includes active and passive mechanisms, both of which are related to feeding organs. However, C. sinensis have water pipes that extend their feet and pipes before they are exposed, relying on the inlet and outlet pipes for feeding and excretion. A. broughtonii does not have water pipes and is selectively fed through gill filaments. There were also differences in the gill structures of the two shellfish. Different physiological structures lead to differences in feeding behavior between two shellfish species in the same culture area. The eukaryotic composition of the stomach contents of the two shellfish species was predominantly phytoplankton and came mainly from the bottom seawater; this was in agreement with the stable isotope results. (3) In BA and BKA, the contribution of organic matter (biodeposition and kelp detritus) produced by the raft culture to A. broughtonii was higher than that to C. sinensis. The contribution of kelp detritus to C. sinensis in BA was higher than that to A. broughtonii. From the perspective of food source structure, both A. broughtonii and C. sinensis can be used as bottom-sown shellfish in the comprehensive aquaculture area of Sanggou Bay, and C. sinensis is more suitable for bottom sowing in areas with algal cultures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李兵,张继红,吴文广,刘毅,王新萌,康秦梓,陈杜宇,宫雪,徐豪.桑沟湾底播养殖青蛤与魁蚶的食物来源[J].中国水产科学,2023,30(12):1468-1478
LI Bing, ZHANG Jihong, WU Wenguang, LIU Yi, WANG Xinmeng, KANG Qinzi, CHEN Duyu, GONG Xue, XU Hao. Study on the food sources of bottom-sowing cultured Cyclina sinesis and Anadara broughtonii in Sanggou Bay[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2023,30(12):1468-1478

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-29
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-18
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-18
  • 出版日期: