黄河河南段浮游生物群落结构特征
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

河南省水产科学研究院, 河南 郑州 450044

作者简介:

王兆平(1978-),女,助理研究员,研究方向为水生生物.E-mail:18339262288@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S931

基金项目:

农业农村部财政专项“黄河渔业资源与环境调查”.


Analysis of the community structure characteristics of plankton inHenan section of the Yellow River
Author:
Affiliation:

Henan Fisheries Science Research Institute, Zhengzhou 450044 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了揭示黄河河南段浮游生物的群落结构特征, 于2023 年5 月、2023 年10 月和2024 年2 月对黄河河南段15 个点位进行了3 次浮游生物采样, 并对样品中的浮游生物进行了定性、定量检测。从浮游生物的种类组成、密度、生物量、优势种及生物多样性5 个方面进行了分析。结果表明, 该15 个点位共检出浮游植物8 门134 种(属),以绿藻门和硅藻门为主, 蓝藻门次之; 浮游动物共检出4 大类66 种(属), 其中轮虫种类最多, 原生动物次之。浮游植物的丰度值变化范围为6.02×104~11.71×106 cells/L, 均值为10.92×105 cells/L, 生物量为0.06~5.83 mg/L, 均值为0.66 mg/L; 浮游动物丰度变化范围为3~2180 ind/L, 均值为164.03 ind/L, 生物量为0.001~3.363 mg/L, 均值为0.33 mg/L。单因素方差分析显示浮游植物密度5 月与10 月有显著差异(P<0.05), 与2 月差异不显著(P>0.05), 浮游动物密度5 月与10 月、2 月有显著差异(P<0.05)。浮游植物和浮游动物生物量5 月与10 月、2 月有显著差异(P<0.05)。小球藻属(Chlorella)、绿球藻属(Chlorocaccam)、纤维藻属(Ankistrodesmus)、衣藻属(Chlamydomonas)、卵囊藻属(Oocystis)、颗粒直链藻(Melosira granulata)、尖针杆藻(Synedra acus)、小环藻属(Cyclotella)、脆杆藻属(Fragilaria)为浮游植物不同时期的共同优势种; 萼花臂尾轮虫(Brachionus calyciflorus)、盖氏晶囊轮虫(Asplanchna girodi)、象鼻溞属(Bosmina)、秀体溞属(Diaphanosoma)、溞属(Daphnia)、猛水蚤属(Harpacticoida)、桡足类无节幼体为浮游动物不同时期的共同优势种。浮游植物Shannon-Wiener 指数变化范围为0.66~4.38, 均值为2.70; Margalef 物种丰富度指数为1.32~4.68, 均值为2.70; Pielou 物种均匀度指数为0.16~0.97, 均值为0.63。浮游动物Shannon-Wiener指数变化范围为0.50~3.02, 均值为1.70; Margalef 物种丰富度指数为0.32~2.33, 均值为1.14; Pielou 物种均匀度指数为0.39~1, 均值为0.84。根据生物多样性指数评价标准, 黄河河南段近期水质级别为轻度污染。

    Abstract:

    To reveal the community structure characteristics of plankton in the Henan section of the Yellow River,three samplings were conducted at 15 sites in May 2023, October 2023, and February 2024. Qualitative andquantitative analyses of plankton in the samples were carried out. The analysis was conducted from five aspects:the species composition, density, biomass, dominant species, and biodiversity of plankton. A total of 134 species(genera) of phytoplankton belonging to 8 phyla, mainly Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta, followed by Cyanophyta,were detected at the 15 sites. A total of 66 species (genera) of zooplankton belonging to four major groups weredetected, among which Rotifera had the largest number of species, followed by Protozoa. The abundance ofphytoplankton ranged from 6.02×104 to 11.71×106 cells/L, with an average of 10.92×105 cells/L, and the biomasswas 0.06–5.83 mg/L, with an average of 0.66 mg/L. The abundance of zooplankton ranged from 3 to 2180 ind/L,with an average of 164.03 ind/L, and the biomass was 0.001–3.363 mg/L, with an average of 0.330 mg/L.One-way analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference in the density of phytoplanktonbetween May and October (P<0.05), but no significant difference between May and February (P > 0.05). Therewere significant differences in the density of zooplankton between May and October and February (P<0.05). Therewere significant differences in the biomass of zooplankton and phytoplankton between May and October andbetween May and February (P<0.05). Chlorella sp., Ankistrodesmus spp., Chlamydomonas spp., Oocystis spp.,Melosira granulata, Synedra acus, Cyclotella spp., and Fragilaria spp. were the dominant species ofphytoplankton in different periods. Brachionus calyciflorus, Asplanchna girodi, Bosmina spp., Diaphanosoma spp.,Daphnia spp., Harpacticoida spp., and Nauplius spp. were the dominant species of zooplankton in differentperiods. The Shannon-Wiener index value of phytoplankton ranged from 0.66 to 4.38, with an average of 2.70. TheMargalef species richness index value was 1.32–4.68, with an average of 2.70. The Pielou species evenness indexvalue was 0.16–0.97, with an average of 0.63. The Shannon-Wiener index value of zooplankton ranged from 0.50to 3.02, with an average of 1.70. The Margalef species richness index value was 0.32–2.33, with an average of1.14. The Pielou species evenness index value was 0.39–1.00, with an average of 0.84. According to thebiodiversity index evaluation criteria, the recent water quality level of the Henan section of the Yellow River wasslightly polluted.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王兆平,惠筠,马超,周晓林,杨慧,贺海战,张清清.黄河河南段浮游生物群落结构特征[J].中国水产科学,2024,31(9):1027-1041
WANG Zhaoping, HUI Yun, MA Chao, ZHOU Xiaolin, YANG Hui, HE Haizhan, ZHANG Qingqing. Analysis of the community structure characteristics of plankton inHenan section of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2024,31(9):1027-1041

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-14
  • 最后修改日期:2024-08-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码