DNA 条形码在鲱形目鱼类物种鉴定和系统进化分析中的应用
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 大连海洋大学 水产与生命学院, 辽宁 大连 116023; 2. 中国水产科学研究院 黄海水产研究所, 山东省渔业资源与生态环境重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266071; 3. 上海海洋大学 水产与生命学院, 上海 201306

作者简介:

作者简介: 李献儒(1989−), 男, 硕士研究生, 从事海洋生物学研究. E-mail: lxrzxn@163.com 通信作者: 柳淑芳, 研究员, 从事海洋分子生态学研究. E-mail: liusf@ysfri.ac.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

Q959

基金项目:

科技基础性工作专项(2013FY110700); 山东省科技发展计划项目(2012GHY11531); 水科院基本科研业务费专项(2013A11); 泰山学者建设工程专项经费.


Species identification and phylogenetic relationships in order Clupeiformes based on DNA barcoding
Author:
Affiliation:

1. College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Fishery Resources and Ecological Environment of Shandong, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用PCR 特异性扩增获得中国近海鲱形目(Clupeiformes) 2 科6 属7 种的48 条线粒体CO I 基因序列, 结合从GenBank 筛选出的4 科40 属83 种的CO I 基因序列225 条, 对鲱形目鱼类的CO I 条形码基因特征、种内与种间遗传距离及其分子系统进化关系进行了分析, 探索了DNA 条形码技术在辅助鱼类物种鉴定和分类中的适应性。结果表明, 4 科41 属90 种273 条CO I 基因序列的平均碱基组成为T: 28.3%、C: 28.3%、A: 24.2%、G: 19.2%, 碱基组成表现出明显偏倚性。鲱形目鱼类种间的平均遗传距离为0.131, 种内平均遗传距离为0.003, 种间距离为种内距离的41 倍; 系统学分析结果显示, 97.8%的鱼类在系统进化树上均为单系。可见, 鲱形目鱼类DNA 条形码符合物种鉴定的要求, 且基于CO I 基因所建的NJ 树对物种分类具有较为准确的辨识力。系统进化分析结果表明, CO I基因不仅能够解决低阶分类单元的系统进化关系, 对于高阶分类单元的系统分析研究结果也有一定参考价值。

    Abstract:

    The order Clupeiformesis in the Class Osteichthyes, and many of these species are of significant economicvalue. The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO I) gene sequences of seven species pertainingto six genera in Clupeiformes collected from Chinese coastal waters were amplified using a polymerase chain reactiontechnique. The homologous sequences of other species of Clupeiformes from GenBank were also includedin this study. A total of 273 single sequences from 90 species pertaining to 41 genera in Clupeiformes were barcodedusing the CO I gene and then sequenced and compared to verify the feasibility of using DNA barcoding toidentify species. Clustal X and MEGA6.0 were used to calculate base composition, sequence substitutions, andgenetic distance. The results indicated that mean T, C, A, and G contents were 28.3%, 28.3%, 24.2%, and 19.2%,respectively, indicating that base composition was biased.The nucleotide sequences revealed base substitutions,including 71 conversion sites and 46 transversion sites. Most appeared on the third codon, including 62 conversionsites and 45 transversion sites. The second codon did not have conversions or transversions. The conversion andtransversion ratio reflects evolutionary rate; if the probability of transversion is greater, the conversion and transversionratio is smaller, and the evolutionary rate is faster. The evolutionary rate of the third codon was the fastest,followed by the first codon, and the second codon was the most stable. DNA barcoding can be used to identifyspecies if the distance between congeners is much larger than that between conspecifics and different individualsof the same species are clustered in the same phylogenetic tree branch. The congeneric and conspecificgeneticdistances were 0.131 and 0.003, respectively, and the congeneric distance was 41 times that of the conspecificdistance. However, some congeneric distances were too small or the conspecific distances were too large, leadingto different names for the same species and intraspecific differentiation. All conspecifics clustered together in thephylogenetic tree, except Dorosoma cepedianum and Dorosoma anale, suggesting that these may be the same species.The phylogenetic analysis showed that 97.8% of the fish were monophyletic. In summary, the DNA barcodesof clupeiform fish complied with the requirements for species identification, and the neighbor-joining tree basedon the CO I gene identified species more accurately. The phylogenetic results show that the CO I gene was suitablefor clarifying primary taxa and provided some reference value for the phylogenetic relationships of senior taxa.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李献儒,柳淑芳,李达,杜腾飞,庄志猛. DNA 条形码在鲱形目鱼类物种鉴定和系统进化分析中的应用[J].中国水产科学,2015,22(6):1133-1141
LI Xianru, LIU Shufang, LI Da, DU Tengfei, ZHUANG Zhimeng. Species identification and phylogenetic relationships in order Clupeiformes based on DNA barcoding[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2015,22(6):1133-1141

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-11-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码