南美白对虾养殖环境及其肠道细菌多样性分析
作者:
作者单位:

1. 苏州大学 基础医学与生物科学学院, 江苏 苏州 215123;
2. 昆山市水产技术推广站, 江苏 苏州 215300

作者简介:

孙振丽(1990-), 女, 硕士研究生. E-mail: zhenlisun@163.com

中图分类号:

S966

基金项目:

江苏省水产三新工程项目(D2013-5-3, D2015-12).

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了探讨南美白对虾( Boone)肠道及其养殖环境中细菌种群组成和分布,采用Illuminamiseq测序平台,基于16S rRNA基因的序列测定结果,对南美白对虾肠道及其养殖池塘底泥、水体中细菌的种群结构进行分析。结果显示,在南美白对虾肠道、养殖池塘底泥、水体分别检测到206、265和270个细菌属,其中,有90个属在3个样品中均可检测到,底泥和水、底泥和虾肠道、水和虾肠道中检测到的共有细菌属分别为146、128和119个,表明养殖池塘底泥、水和肠道中细菌存在密切的相互作用。在底泥、水和虾肠道样品中丰度大于1%的优势菌属分别有20、17和10个;底泥、水体和虾肠道中丰度最高的细菌均为一种分类未明的细菌属,丰度分别为23.08%、37.13%和42.22%。除此之外,底泥中主要优势细菌属分别为假单胞菌属()(3.88%);水体中主要优势细菌属分别为土壤杆菌属( (3.95%)和GPIIa(3.20%),而虾肠道中主要优势细菌属分别为假单胞菌属()(6.54%)。在底泥、水和肠道中分别检测到3、6和6个潜在致病细菌属,丰度最高的细菌属分别是假单胞菌属(5.77%)、黄杆菌属() (0.77%)和假单胞菌属(14.57%)。在底泥、水和肠道中检测到的益生菌可分别分配至8、6和7个细菌属,其中有5个属在3个样品中均可检测到。聚类分析显示,养殖池塘底泥、水体和南美白对虾肠道细菌种群中丰富度位于前20的分类操作单元(OUT)在聚类树的位置存在明显不同。研究结果进一步加深了对健康南美白对虾肠道细菌种群及其与养殖环境中细菌种群互作的理解,为益生菌制剂的研发提供了新的线索。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the bacterial species composition and distribution in the intestine of Boone and its aquacultural environment, we used Illumina MiSeq high-throughput pyrosequencing to analyze the composition of the bacterial communities in the gut of Boone and its aquacultural sediments and water, based on the 16S rRNA sequence. We detected 206, 265, and 270 genera in the gut of Boone, the aquaculture sediment, and the water, respectively. Ninety genera occurred in all three samples, 146 genera in the sediment and water, 128 in the sediment and intestine. This indicates the close interaction between the bacteria in the shrimp intestine and their aquacultural environment. Twenty, seventeen, and ten dominant genera with a relative abundance in the total sequences of > 1% occurred in the sediment, water, and intestine, respectively. Unclassified genera were the most abundant in all the samples, accounting for 23.08%, 37.13%, and 42.22% of the total sequences from the sediment, water, and Ohtaekwangia (4.79%), and Sediminibacterium (6.64%), (3.95%), and GPIIa (3.20%) were the dominant genera in water; and the predominant genera in the Acinetobacter (6.54%). Three, three, and six potentially pathogenic bacterial genera were also observed in the sediment, water, and Boone intestine, respectively, and the most abundant were (14.57%), respectively. Six, eight, and seven probiotic genera were also found in the sediment, water, and Boone intestine, respectively, and among these genera, five were shared by all three samples. A cluster analysis showed that the 20 most abundant operational taxonomic units in each sample (sediment, water, and Boone intestine) differed significantly. These results provide insight into the interactions between the microbiota in the intestine of Boone and those in its aquacultural environment, and provide new data for the development of probiotics.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

孙振丽,宣引明,张皓,蒋明,潘云生,张益明,龚叶平,陆小平,余德山,薛仁宇,胡小龙,曹广力,贡成良.南美白对虾养殖环境及其肠道细菌多样性分析[J].中国水产科学,2016,23(3):594-605
SUN Zhenli, XUAN Yinming, ZHANG Hao, JIANG Ming, PAN Yunsheng, ZHANG Yiming, GONG Yeping, LU Xiaoping, YU Deshan, XUE Renyu, HU Xiaolon. Bacterial diversity in the Penaeus vannamei Boone intestine and aquaculture environment[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2016,23(3):594-605

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-05-18
文章二维码