黄河源区浮游植物群落结构特征及其环境驱动因素
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所, 湖北 武汉 430223 ;2.华中农业大学水产学院, 湖北 武汉 430070 ;3.甘肃省玛曲青藏高原土著鱼类自然保护区管理局, 甘肃 玛曲 747300

作者简介:

吴湘香(1981-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为水生生物学.E-mail:wuxiangxiang2007@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S931

基金项目:

农业农村部财政专项“黄河渔业资源与环境调查”; 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2023TD09)


Dynamics and environmental drivers of the phytoplankton communityin the source region of the Yellow River
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223 , China ;2.College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070 , China ;3.Gansu Maqu Tibetan Plateau Indigenous Fish Nature Reserve Administration, Maqu 747300 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究黄河源区初级生产者浮游植物群落结构特征及其环境驱动因素, 于2023 年春季(4—5 月)和夏季(8—9月), 对黄河河源区干流和支流(曲麻莱-兴海, 河段约1200 km)进行了2 次调查, 共采集了33 个站点水样。鉴定出浮游植物7 门235 种(属), 平均密度182.75×104 cells/L, 平均生物量55.35×10−3 mg/L, 其中硅藻门为优势类群, 种类数占比72.31%。从时间上, 物种组成和丰度存在季节差异, 浮游植物物种数、平均密度春季均高于夏季, 平均生物量春季低于夏季, 但差异均不显著; 从空间上, 浮游植物物种数、平均密度和生物量干流均高于支流, 浮游植物物种数下游最高, 浮游植物平均密度和生物量中游最高, 但差异不显著。黄河源区浮游植物Shannon- Wiener 多样性指数(H')、Margalef 丰富度指数(d)和Pielou 均匀度指数(J)均值分别为2.87±0.66、6.65±0.94 和0.77±0.17, 春季均低于夏季, 且季节差异极显著。浮游植物优势度Y≥0.02 的优势种共9 种, 主要为硅藻门藻类, 春、夏两季均为优势种的藻类包括中型脆杆藻(Fragilaria intermedia)、二头脆杆藻(Fragilaria biceps)、肘状针杆藻(Synedra ulna)、念珠状等片藻(Diatoma moniliforme)、胀大桥弯藻(Cymbella turgidula)。浮游植物群落与环境因子的相关性分析表明, 黄河源区春季和夏季浮游植物群落结构的影响因素不同, 在春季浮游植物密度和生物量主要影响因素有海拔(ASL)、河宽(RW)、流速(FV)等因素, 而夏季主要有高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)、叶绿素a(Chl.a)、悬浮物(SS)、透明度(SD)等因素。本研究成果可为黄河流域水生态保护的科学决策提供重要基础数据。

    Abstract:

    The source region of the Yellow River is located in the eastern region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau andthe ecological environment in the basin is fragile. The climate in this area is classified as plateau sub-cold zone,semi-humid and plateau temperate zone, semi-humid. The annual rainfall is approximately 300 mm, and theaverage annual water temperature is 3.4‒7.2 ℃. As the global climate is changing and human activities areincreasing, the ecological environment of the basin is confronting great pressure. The protection and restoration ofthe environment around the Yellow River has become the focus of human society. To explore the characteristics ofthe phytoplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors, two comprehensiveinvestigations were undertaken in the main stem and tributaries of the Yellow River in the spring and summer of2023, respectively. The total length of the survey site of the river was 1200 km. Phytoplankton samples werecollected from 33 survey stations along the source region of the Yellow River. The environmental parametersincluding water temperature, dissolved oxygen level, conductivity, turbidity, pH, chlorophyll a level, suspendedsolid levels, flow velocity, river width, transparency, altitude, latitude, and longitude were collected in the field.One liter of water was collected in a polytetrafluoride bottle and returned to the laboratory for analyses of waterquality indices, including total nitrogen and total phosphorus levels and the potassium permanganate index. Intotal, 235 species of phytoplankton belonging to seven genera were identified, with an average density andbiomass of 182.75×104 cells/L and 55.35×10−3 mg/L, respectively. Diatoms were the dominant species, accountingfor 72.31% of all species. Seasonal changes in species composition and abundance existed, but were notsignificant. From the perspective of spatial dynamics, the phytoplankton species and their abundance in the mainstem proceeded to the tributaries. The number of phytoplankton species was highest in the downstream area, andthe average density and biomass of phytoplankton were highest in the middle reaches. The Shannon-Wienerdiversity index, Margalef’s richness index, and Pielou’s evenness index values were 2.87±0.66, 6.65±0.94, and0.77±0.17, respectively. Biodiversity analysis showed that the diversity index values of the phytoplanktoncommunity were higher in spring than in summer, and these seasonal differences were highly significant. Therewere nine dominant species of phytoplankton, mainly belonging to Bacillariophyta. The dominant species in bothspring and summer were Fragilaria intermedia, Fragilaria biceps, Synedra ulna, Diatoma moniliforme, and Cymbella turgidula. Correlation analyses between the phytoplankton community structure and environmentalfactors showed that the influencing factors of the phytoplankton community structure were different in spring andsummer in the source region of the Yellow River. The main factors affecting phytoplankton density and biomass inspring were altitude, river width, and flow velocity, while in summer the main factors were the potassiumpermanganate index value, chlorophyll a level, suspended solid level, and transparency. The results of this studyprovide an important foundation for scientific decision-making regarding basin ecological environment protectionand management in the Yellow River.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴湘香,马宝珊,茹辉军,王宏,杨尖拉毛,张燕,吴凡,杨传顺,李云峰.黄河源区浮游植物群落结构特征及其环境驱动因素[J].中国水产科学,2024,31(9):1015-1026
WU Xiangxiang, MA Baoshan, RU Huijun, WANG Hong, YangJianlamao, ZHANG Yan, WU Fan, YANG Chuanshun, LI Yunfeng. Dynamics and environmental drivers of the phytoplankton communityin the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2024,31(9):1015-1026

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码